Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Bryan Venable wrote:
> http://www.qyjohn.net/?p=492
>
> Interesting take on Canonical/Ubuntu's relationship with the Linux
> community and how it relates to the "OS wars" in general.
If Canonical is making their code available, they are doing great in my
book. If developers want to use their code, they should use it. It
certainly isn't a requirement to send patches to the Linux kernel
developers, but Canonical has sent 100 patches.
So what if Novell sent more patches than Canonical? The article points
out that Suse has been around since 1994 and Canonical's Ubuntu only since
2004, but I think Novell acquired Suse in November 2003, so that is hardly
relevant. It seems more likely to me that Ubuntu has been focused on the
user interface much more than on kernel functionality, so that probably
explains the difference in patch production.
Mike
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members