Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Fallert, Adam Christian wrote:
> Honestly, I tried Google Chrome and I wasn't too impressed with it. As
> far as browsers that use the WebKit rendering engine go I think Apple
> Safari has the best implelmentation of it. That would be the one I
> would like to see ported to linux.
I've been using it. It isn't perfect, but it has an important feature
that the other browsers seem to be lacking: Every tab is a distinct
process, so if something goes wrong, I can kill a tab to fix it. Firefox
tends to crash on me, but Google Chrome will not crash. I don't know what
Safari is like. I think it doesn't run tabs as separate processes though.
Google created a multi-process browser for a good reason: They want
people to be able to use their web-based apps without having to worry that
something else running in the browser will crash their app. Even if you
prefer a different browser, when it comes to using Google apps, you'll
probably want to use Chrome.
Right now the thing that bugs me most about Chrome is that it won't open
files on the fly. For example, it will only download a .doc file instead
of just opening MS Word to display it. I seem to have no control over how
different file types are handled. Strange, because I think that feature
was present in the first browser I used back in early 1995 -- Mosaic -- so
it isn't exactly a novel idea.
Mike
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members