Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 17:01 -0500, Mike Miller wrote:
> My response:
>
>
> Thanks for sharing that. That is interesting information. Apparently, the
> 4200 RPM HDD took 50% or more time than the SSD on every job but only 25%
> longer on "untar kernel," for some reason.
>
> On NewEgg.com, most of the 64GB SSD drives are in the $700-$800 range, but
> there's this one at $285:
>
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820208432
>
> So what's wrong with that one?! ;-)
>
> Mike
It's using slower and shorter-lived multi-level cell (MLC) Flash rather
than the much more expensive, faster, and longer-lived single-level cell
(SLC) Flash. The "-M" at the end of the product name gives it away:
http://www.transcendusa.com/Products/ModDetail.asp?ModNo=177
Transcend's own data lists the MLC version as 116 MB/sec read, 43 MB/sec
write vs. 119 MB/sec read, 64 MB/sec writes for the SLC Flash. They do
not list the estimated life span in I/O operations for the two types but
they do note that the SLC version is recommended for OS installation:
http://www.transcendusa.com/Products/ModDetail.asp?ModNo=177&SpNo=3&LangNo=0
I hope that answers your question.
--Jack
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members