Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Jonathan King wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
<EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
Before i make a real effort I want to be sure because it kinda looks like
maybe you copied my "N" and then typed "n" when you meant "N".
If by "student," you meant "grad student," then maybe I shouldn't even
try, but if you meant high school student, then I probably have some hope of
succeeding.
I was an undergraduate. But it did take me about six months to figure it
out.
Wow. And he posts the thing on a Friday evening without telling us
this, probably just to trying to get us to bite. That was not very
nice. Let's do the math: took Stephen 6 months to do as a strapping 19
year old maths major in his calculational prime. Mike and I are
doddering psychologists in our 40s who have kids and stuff. I estimate
this could take me, personally, til the twelfth of never.
jking
ps--is there any clever way to use facts about things like
hypergeometric series here or am I veering off the true path?
I don't know if hypergeometric series would help - I don't know much
about them - but my guess is that it might be related.
My initial solution was rather complicated, but about six or seven years
later I spotted a much simpler solution. Apply the operation f'(y-1) to
both sides, and use induction.
It is related to the fact that the power series for the inverse function
to x e^(-x) is something like sum_{n=1}^infty n^(n-1) x^n/n! - this is
the so called W-Lambert function.
Stephen
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members