Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Robert Citek wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 3:15 PM, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
Finally, with mock exasperation, I said, "O.K., let's try one that's a
little less complicated: You want a movie or an album. You don't want
to pay for it. So you download it."
There it was: the bald-faced, worst-case example, without any nuance or
mitigating factors whatsoever.
"Who thinks that might be wrong?"
Two hands out of 500.
Two other things to try:
1) One more example:
"Let's say you're in a band and your band creates a music CD, shelling
out the money yourself for production costs. You sell a copy to your
friend, who then copies it and gives it to all your other friends."
2) Flip the question:
"Who thinks that's OK?"
I like how you think, Robert! How about this one?:
Your rock band creates a music CD, and tries to recoup the production cost
by selling CDs for only $5.00 apiece. A multi-billion dollar record
company gets a copy of your CD, makes it into MP3 files and gives it away
on their web site for free. A Google search for the name of your band
gives that recording company's web page as its first hit. No one buys
another of your CDs and you lose $1,000 on the deal.
Who thinks that is OK?
Making a record company the bad guy might work even better than making
friends the bad guys.
Mike
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members