MLUG: Re: [MLUG] Compiz (was "Parallels vs. VMware Fusion for the Mac?")
Re: [MLUG] Compiz (was "Parallels vs. VMware Fusion for the Mac?")
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
If you don't foresee a need to boot the machine into Windows, Parallels or VMware Fusion standalone is the way to go. I'm planning on getting a MacBook early next year and I doubt I'll even bother with Bootcamp. It's much easier to maintain in a VM in my opinion.

How strict is Microsoft about the OEM activation? Could you legally move that copy, which I assume you bought with a piece of cheap hardware, to Mac in the first place? I did reactivation with an OEM copy of XP Home a few years ago and it went pretty smoothly, but I was just moving a hard disk into a new machine.

Definitely check out Q.app (http://www.kju-app.org/kju/). It's basically qemu in a nice OS X format. There's no kernel accelerator for XNU yet, so it's a bit slow, but the guy is supposedly working on it. qemu is really cool too, and it's great for a free VM to test Linux stuff.

  ryan woodsmall
    EMAIL:PROTECTED


"Be well, do good work, and keep in touch." - Garrison Keillor




On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:59 PM, Jonathan King wrote:

So you think I would be safer here with the no Boot Camp all Parallels
approach? I'm guessing that's right, the more I contemplate what could
go wrong. If I were made of money, I would have bought a non-OEM copy
of Windows, but I had like 140 reasons not to do that.

jking

_______________________________________________ members mailing list EMAIL:PROTECTED http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members