Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG] Parallels vs. VMware Fusion for the Mac?
- From: Rick <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:48:26 -0600
- Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:49:11 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VXPh2mpjknuo53RGJYNdnNqgRINZCopRlrrzDJcMiLs=; b=g074/DgWelRyeuu74tnhrrQgrroVScfPC15boUKQ12cinD6nB2tzrCgvfP5iHofJVH5xyLGC2b4eql6wCB9E/jJyu2pjJu05LWaXfmoy9DU/CP9ROs11BwOGIbYeJYYuB3xJNaw0OGDDIBhfundGNLXU2BCd4ALMX9bWUtLBRLY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=CtXOhTYOWVYaOAXEFhzGBBKwPNTY/bYsffs17BTg6TnoJ5ocBp7ALPXGR1t+/eQ9McOUqVw2dJWEkjzgoRsZcvRSiAVOJm7a7oHFD8Ho0lLQL7eP4JtFDea1F4G3B/NzyxoKr00IMzyKdM4X9HKWsVNdm/sf7b+XQIuSxI9Zg20=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
I haven't actually played with it, but one of the guys here in the
office sent me this a while back:
http://venturecake.com/10-minutes-to-run-every-windows-app-seamlessly-on-your-ubuntu-desktop
He uses it and says it works well although I'm not sure if it helps you
or not on a Macbook.
Rick
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:35 -0500, Jonathan King wrote:
> Sigh...it looks like I really cannot conveniently avoid paying the
> Microsoft tax to run the stuff I need for the NIH. But I did avoid
> buying a Windows notebook, so I am now trying to figure out which
> approach to running XP Pro alongside of Mac OS X will be best. The two
> out there are Parallels 3.0 and WMware Fusion.
>
> As far as I can tell, both can (either right now or in a small number
> of days) get the job done, and specifically, will allow me to do an XP
> Pro set up with Boot Camp (for the shameful moments of my life where I
> truly do need to boot into XP) and then use the same installation for
> virtualization. The trick is here that I am going to attempt to set
> this up with an OEM/system builder copy of XP Pro, and I need to avoid
> the hose of it deciding my hardware set up is different in these two
> situations. The work-around here seems to involve having the same MAC
> address for networking visible to Windows in both situation, but
> correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Does anybody out there have any experience setting this up, preferably
> with Leopard?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Jon King
>
--
An apple a day keeps anyone away if your throw it hard enough.
-Patrick Cassels
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members