Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG membership <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: [MLUG] licenses and choices
- From: Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:54:54 -0500 (CDT)
- Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:55:12 -0500
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Jonathan King wrote:
I'm actually fine with this, as well. I just pointed it out because
although this seems like a pretty cool product, it will end up costing
you, and this (reasonably) has some effect on my enthusiasm. Or, to put
it another way, Google Docs now has a pretty neato data import feature,
and this costs me nothing, so I'm more likely to play with it. It's
clear that kirix is going to be able to do a lot more, but it's not yet
completely clear to me how much of this I'll be doing, so there you go.
The trick with "free as in beer" software is that you still have lock-in
problems. This is why Microsoft doesn't really mind piracy in the third
world (despite what they might say for self-protective legal reasons):
It helps them a lot.
If software is very easy to learn, I don't mind the licensing too much.
I use Google and Google Maps all the time even though they are
proprietary. What have I got to lose? I'm not spending a lot of my time
learning them and there isn't an open-source replacement that I know of.
They are likely to stay free (as in beer) forever because Google makes
more money that way than by selling access.
Mike
On 9/25/07, Rick <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
Well, while I have the linux bigot's love of open source projects, I'm
pragmatic enough to understand that companies don't do things for some
crazy altruistic reason. They do things to make money. In some
instances, open source helps companies do that (regardless of MS'
"facts" to the contrary). But if a company wants to write software and
put it under something other than the GPL, more power to them. My only
issue is when said company is attempting to unethically benefit from the
hard work of others.
I'm pretty ok with a company making money off of me as long as they
provide me with something that I desire for a reasonable fee.
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members