Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG] nano and emacs
- From: Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 07:57:45 -0500 (CDT)
- Delivery-date: Tue, 01 May 2007 07:58:06 -0500
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Raymond Myers wrote:
Those are just some of reasons that I personally wouldn't switch from
emacs. If I was looking to list ALL the features that both vim and emacs
have over nano, I would be here all day.
Hear, hear!!
Emacs is more of an environment than it is a simple text editor.
I've been using it for years but I have only scratched the surface when it
comes to emacs functionality. There is a vast world there.
Mike
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact