Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG] good video card choice to run Beryl?
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:22:56 -0500
- Delivery-date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:23:57 -0500
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070327 SeaMonkey/1.1.1
Jonathan King wrote:
I am trying to spec out a cheap-ish Linux box that, however, should
have graphics performance good enough to support the next-generation
GL-based GUIs, e.g., Beryl.
As it happens, the possibilities seem to be pretty much infinite. For
all I know, you can get acceptable 3-D and GL performance out of one
of the Intel integrated graphics solutions, but it's not too easy to
find out whether this is true or not. Does anybody out there know of
any good solutions out there that are substantially better than
integrated graphics in the less than $150 range, or should I just not
bother optimizing this choice and instead just get a hideous amount of
RAM? :-)
jking
I cannot speak for the Intel solutions. But I am currently very
impressed by the nVidia drivers for Linux and FreeBSD. And if you get
something a little older, like their 5200 card, I think you can easily
meet your price range. I must admit that I don't know Beryl, but with
bzflag - a GL intensive game - it performs brilliantly.
Stephen
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members