Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Members" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: [MLUG] good video card choice to run Beryl?
- From: "Jonathan King" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:11:37 -0400
- Delivery-date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:12:13 -0500
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=UFhNUlLFmt0jDjH9tAzPjVmEhXJnSPTp68DcepjntvpA8Cj0XVrDThm32yoj8Kuo0slqqSm7nkk7jXU6NJqSjPqfBAKjc+kzfzwTI3iAZBXaVzifmoI7uPxinHozvh5lYupk29zR6P9rKFwIrFP3zupkJUlI+q6JlSoEDI+dqXQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=SRInjPZnAV2QMFu5F9bEl/Ft8ulyYodWohiufrkUb4AX228l1dFQoJJByg3hUZdUbcdBri9gsSwZzt/T7B59M188l8c14UN3hwU3TRolXrZryHwNjxMr7fQEfw7u9SF6ogxNzGJI+9ipFpBzFI7YK8I1BMgHqwD+D6kiaWwntpA=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
I am trying to spec out a cheap-ish Linux box that, however, should
have graphics performance good enough to support the next-generation
GL-based GUIs, e.g., Beryl.
As it happens, the possibilities seem to be pretty much infinite. For
all I know, you can get acceptable 3-D and GL performance out of one
of the Intel integrated graphics solutions, but it's not too easy to
find out whether this is true or not. Does anybody out there know of
any good solutions out there that are substantially better than
integrated graphics in the less than $150 range, or should I just not
bother optimizing this choice and instead just get a hideous amount of
RAM? :-)
jking
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members