Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Members" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection
- From: "Scott Hussey" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 15:07:00 -0800
- Delivery-date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 17:07:33 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FnVI0QixF3auQYijygbJyM6qNf0N12pfZgK2H0jyDa9MFVYcaFDCBYGFrd3PW4hD2DI3E5nGGrqPxPctozVGqScU9eQCGfnoQkythDM+Nyv4fi/RFvmS9LvG9RoeEB/xtEiiQH6etQU6pEUouspbX4OcZEzGcQ7VwzuEnvkoT3c=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On 2/2/07, Jonathan King <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
So this is not to say that lots of people won't buy Vista or that the
feds will shun it forever, just that there is no big rush to Vista at
the moment for many very large IT outfits, and I don't see this
changing very quickly.
This is what I've heard at work as well. Because of the hardware
requirements and such, we'll keep on keeping on with XP until 3rd
party tools start to require Vista or Microsoft makes XP maintenance
contracts prohibitively expensive.
--
Scott Hussey
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://www.alexusstudios.com
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact