Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Jerry Gamblin wrote:
Here are two articles:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/11/26/romney_administration_reviewing_trips_made_by_technology_chief/
http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/26/225231
You can use google and find one that you think is unbiased yourself if
you dont like these. What it boils down to is that OSS supporters paid
for trips to Japan, Brazil, Ottawa, San Francisco while he was backing a
huge move to OSS. You cant tell me that on the surface it isn't a
conflict of interest. It is very similar to the golf junkets a senator
is serving time in jail for right now.
Thanks. Of course this was not mentioned in the article you sent earlier.
Maybe you think it is OK for senators to be paid by lobbyists. I don't
think it is OK, especially not when there is a quid-pro-quo -- that is
definitely illegal. What happened with Quinn was definitely *not* similar
to the case with Delay.
It sounds like Quinn was asked to speak because he was in favor of open
standards and not the reverse. I find it remarkable that you seem to want
to impugn the man's integrity. Why?
I'll tell you this: If they paid his travel and room and board, and gave
him nothing else (e.g., no honorarium), he wasn't being bribed and he was
doing them a favor and not vice-versa. According to the article he gave
to talks at conferences for which his travel was not even paid!
It looks to me like Quinn was pretty honest and even heroic and he was
attacked violently and unfairly. What do you expect?
Mike
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members