Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Members" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG] Open Document Format in Minnesota?
- From: "Jonathan King" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:12:00 -0500
- Delivery-date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:12:25 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DX/rBcExJ5yMSXM3Z3sJ42pIFgIRCKLATeElVD6LEKa/VI/U0ydn9O4+xFSDf4ILX+8YXSvuYDxmBn9MxGToNJMw2hGw5+rUzczFPZip7ng+LGeyFQV5/hnF1mWTM+NhLjffImwF6jvCwwKFwdo6BF4HhHbwmxrGWr3qxj+0UlM=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On 1/22/07, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
Mike Miller wrote:
>
> Microsoft can continue to do their thing indefinitely, but they are
> slowly being worn down. They were forced, entirely against their
> interests, to start using an open file format. I don't know if their
> version of open XML is any better than the one that had already been
> developed by OpenOffice group. Having their own format widely adopted
> will give them a little more time, but in the end, having an open format
> takes away one more reason to want to use MS Office instead of Open Office.
>
> For me, widespread adoption of an open file format is a lot more
> important than the success of Open Office. I think this will do a lot
> to encourage competition.
I agree with Mike.
Amazing; weather.com's map of lightning strikes shows an almost
complete absence of thunderbolt from the blue activity. :-)
That this law forces MS to do the right thing is a
good thing. The open document movement is primarily about getting
things open, not an anti-MS movement.
I agree with this, too. But I have to say that it's not merely
format-lockin that will be a problem. Whole business processes far
larger than I could ever have imagined turn out to be dependent on
things like a ratty old Access database somewhere or a handful of
Excel macros that have to run, or else.
That said, the movement to XML-based document formats is probably
almost as deep and important a move as open-ness per se. Anything you
can mess around with using E4X would be really tough to close back up.
jking
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members