Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Members" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Open source calendaring (was RE: [MLUG] Open Document Format in Minnesota?)
- From: "Hargus, Diana" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:30:02 -0600
- Delivery-date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:30:56 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; h=Received:X-MimeOLE:Content-class:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Thread-Topic:thread-index:Importance:Priority:From:To; b=srJieLK8Z0/eWUxmkDXnpxIJ/PoEaxF9py+ywzF2pqlTqjU0nGPcJxuJonFDHJeswZTnuLv+e3QaEpirdOad3LHHzp44zHIJIUgAlDCOoyEc5JZbNLD6nfkx5orvVU2S; c=nofws; d=ded.mo.gov; q=dns; s=postfix
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Importance: normal
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Priority: normal
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Thread-index: Acc+R7GpAfsf/rR6QYGz2OJ5Sy35vQAAnKsA
- Thread-topic: Open source calendaring (was RE: [MLUG] Open Document Format in Minnesota?)
>-----Original Message-----
>From: EMAIL:PROTECTED
>[mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Miller
>Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 11:06 AM
>To: MLUG Members
>Subject: Re: [MLUG] Open Document Format in Minnesota?
>
>On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Jerry Gamblin wrote:
>
>>> I think Massachusetts has already done this. I hope this passes in
>>> Minnesota and that many states will follow:
>>>
>>> http://ros.leg.mn/bin/bldbill.php?bill=H0176.0.html&session=ls85
>>>
>>
>> The Massachusetts case is interesting. OOS "people" spent a ton of
>> money to get the open document format passed in the state
>and signed into law.
>> It was thought (on the internet anyway) this would be the start of
>> widespread adoption of OpenOffice (etc) until Microsoft
>released there
>> own ODF and sold Massachusetts one of the largest Office
>2007 licenses
>> to date.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Office_Open_XML
>>
>> It looks like Minneotas law will be the same thing.
>
>
>Microsoft can continue to do their thing indefinitely, but
>they are slowly being worn down. They were forced, entirely
>against their interests, to start using an open file format.
>I don't know if their version of open XML is any better than
>the one that had already been developed by OpenOffice group.
>Having their own format widely adopted will give them a little
>more time, but in the end, having an open format takes away
>one more reason to want to use MS Office instead of Open Office.
>
>For me, widespread adoption of an open file format is a lot
>more important than the success of Open Office. I think this
>will do a lot to encourage competition.
>
>Mike
>
This line of concersation got me thinking on a subject discussed
several years ago about open source calendaring. I decided to do
a search and found this"
http://www.opengroupware.org/en/applications/index.html
and am going to try it at my other job and see how it works. They
want a cheap and easy calendaring and mail system and this looks
interesting. Has anyone else tried this product yet?
Thanks for bringing up the subject!
Diana
***********************
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for those to which it is addressed and may contain information which is privileged, confidential and prohibited from disclosure and unauthorized use under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, or copying of this e-mail or the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited by the sender. If you have received this transmission in error, please return the material received to the sender and delete all copies from your system.
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members