Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG membership <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: [MLUG] Linux time command -- "kernel mode" and "user mode"
- From: Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:05:46 -0600 (CST)
- Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:06:20 -0600
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
We have written a program in C++ and we have also written it with a
slightly different algorithm in Python. We want to see how much slower
the Python program is than the C++ program. We get these results:
Python:
------
real 10m43.357s
user 9m51.050s
sys 0m23.420s
C++:
------
real 8m16.668s
user 5m38.360s
sys 2m37.780s
The thing I'm trying to understand is what the differences are in the
three kinds of timings. "real" is pretty easy to understand, but it is
the least useful of the three times because it depends heavily on system
load. This was extracted from "man time" on GNU/Linux:
When the -p option is given the (portable) output format
real %e
user %U
sys %S
is used.
%E Elapsed real time (in [hours:]minutes:seconds).
%e (Not in tcsh.) Elapsed real time (in seconds).
%S Total number of CPU-seconds that the process spent in kernel mode.
%U Total number of CPU-seconds that the process spent in user mode.
Now I just need a more thorough understanding of "kernel mode" and "user
mode" -- know any references?
What I'm really interested in knowing is how the programs would compare in
elapsed time under optimal conditions -- no other process competing for
CPU, disk, etc. What would come closest to answering my question?
Should I just add together the %S and %U times (kernel-mode seconds plus
user-mode seconds)? Does that seem right?
Any tips will be appreciated. Thanks.
Mike
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members