MLUG: Re: [MLUG] Oh, look, Hulshof voted against net neutrality
Re: [MLUG] Oh, look, Hulshof voted against net neutrality
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Chris Topinka wrote:

This describes what's going on pretty well:

http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/1882

Seems like we're going through a renaissance of backdoor committees.


Now I'm very confused. The bill enforces "net neutrality" and it passed by a 321-101 vote:

http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/2619

But this vote, the one we were looking at yesterday, shows the vote was 269 to 152 against:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll239.xml

But that was just on an amendment. I guess there were several votes that day. Here is the vote on the bill:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll241.xml

Democrats and Republicans voted in the same direction on the bill, but Democrats were much more divided. So this wasn't as partisan and divisive as we were thinking it was.

Also, getting back to the original posting: Hulshof voted in favor of the bill, not against it. He only voted against the Markey amendment.

Mike

_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members