Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Members" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG] Win 2003 Vs Linux (from Discussion)
- From: "Jerry Gamblin" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 15:41:48 -0500
- Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:42:56 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Xzv561WFiYLqBL028tv0BHR0Ud4yfyu7MLEnBEV9WB5tYYdKtO4luONJvtLqY7kCMpjAsHSQPOsGcu1X2swUwyFK6G3+DLtPrw+QjMusHluMgf3hogw6QTBITZQWb4Z8RKUt05aJl5B69BUgeRouRdWw8mLqEtXr2iqmhf6fmRM=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On 6/7/06, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
I just don't believe that the Linux patches require reboots. I think only
kernel upgrades should require reboots. Someone please correct me and
explain this if I am not correct.
Mike
Just to make sure I wasn't seeing things I ran the "Package Updater"
on a fedora install I use at work and right now I have this package
that ask for a reboot (just asks, isnt required).
hal - 0.5.7-3.fc5.2.i386 updates hal - 0.5.7-3.fc5.1.i386
hal-gnome - 0.5.7-3.fc5.2.i386 updates hal-gnome - 0.5.7-3.fc5.1.i386
http://www.jerryandmissy.com/mlug/Screenshot.png
I am guessing this *could* be done with out a reboot but that's not
what the OS suggest.
--
Thanks,
Jerry Gamblin
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact