Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Members" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG] Oh, no...
- From: "Mark Rages" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:00:33 -0500
- Delivery-date: Tue, 09 May 2006 12:00:45 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=N5psO0BVRGLYLlh1FhhqGNMEgE9JWafNLrXOF09sLMx4K8g0Tb4CrKw7+fi4acNvN0lUOxnGIn1cKgsxuNxg5+tWJllvWM5ZmdPD91ReT5lzrLwecMhGgi4rHG/q0pUWtg7PjksNRUCknjDjemz+49Z8+OGpxjRywWX/PyXsMNE=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On 5/9/06, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Phillip Kelchen wrote:
> Well, I think the Net neutrality debate just hit a little closer to
> home:
>
> http://news.com.com/Smaller+cable+firms+take+aim+at+Net+neutrality+fans/2100-1028_3-6069873.html?tag=nefd.top
I'm not clear on the meaning of "net neutrality." Does it mean that
internet provider companies can't charge more for some services than for
others? If so, I'm all for it. If it means that they can't have
bandwidth charges, I'm against it.
I think the cable TV companies want to charge extra if you watch video
over the Internet. And the phone company wants to charge extra if you
use VoIP.
Regards,
Mark
EMAIL:PROTECTED
--
You think that it is a secret, but it never has been one.
- fortune cookie
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact