MLUG: Re: [MLUG] Reasonable hard disk throughput numbers?
Re: [MLUG] Reasonable hard disk throughput numbers?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 10:23, Matt Klaric wrote:

> That said, I do remember a time (somewhere late in the 2.4 kernel line)
> where XFS was having some issues.  Things were getting garbled and files
> would have extra data appended to them in the case of an unclean umount.
> However, if memory serves me correctly all of those problems were
> addressed prior to XFS being included in the kernel.
>
> --matt

Aha. That would explain the comments of it being corruptible if not cleanly 
umounted. I have only even used Reiser and ext2 as they are the default FSes 
for / and /boot in my distribution, so I can't say much for XFS. Maybe I will 
give it a try when I install SuSE 10.1 (when it finally gets out of beta) as 
it is supported. 

Phillip

_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members