MLUG: Re: [MLUG] Reasonable hard disk throughput numbers?
Re: [MLUG] Reasonable hard disk throughput numbers?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Phillip Kelchen wrote:

Also, XFS is supposed to be the best "big file throughput" file system. Its
only downside is that it needs to be cleanly umounted or it will become
corrupted. So you would need a UPS or something to ensure that you can
cleanly umount the disk if the power goes off.

XFS is a journaled filesystem so it doesn't need to be cleanly unmounted. It *may* become corrupt if you keep umounting uncleanly, but it's far more robust than the above paragraph seems to state.

ex-SGI employee,

--dlloyd

_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members