Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
No kidding. We had a situation a while back where some political
machinations prevented IATS from installing wireless stations in our
work center. The center was VERY intense about what software could and
could not be installed and rightly proud of how impenetrable their
firewall and security was... and really they did a very good job even if
I bumped my head against a few things from time to time...
The thing though.... the solution to the wireless problem was to
install an airport INSIDE of the firewall with a broadcast SSID and no
WEP or other security letting anyone near the north side of the building
on the street behind our firewall with ease.
I always found that a bit curious.
Mike Miller wrote:
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Christian M. Cepel wrote:
The nightmares with showme, silver, black, gold, etc here on campus
have put a very bad taste in my mouth. When asked, the excuse was
that AIX is the most secure. The answer to that was perhaps, but not
so much more secure that it warrants the nightmare when other nearly
as secure and just better *nixes are available.
"Security" is often a bit of a ruse. I know of a place where they run
OpenVMS because it is "secure" but they don't use secure protocols so
people are connecting by ordinary FTP and Telnet from all over the
planet. Is that more secure than a well-patched Linux box running SSH?
I don't think so. Will they dump OpenVMS in favor of Linux? No,
because OpenVMS is "more secure."
Mike
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members