Re: [MLUG] mono

[Igor Izyumin <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Not everything is web-based.  .NET and Mono is great for things like 
desktop apps.  Let's face it, C (or even C++) is a horrible language for 
such things.  Windows developers pretty much embraced C# the day it came 
out, because it provided much better performance than Java and has many 
other benefits.  I think .NET is an excellent technology and Linux 
developers would be foolish not to embrace it.
-- Igor

Shawn Parker wrote:

> why not invest more heavily in the lamp (linux, apache, postgre,
> mysql, php, perl, python, ruby, etc) stack instead of coming up with a
> middle ground for .net?
>
>
>
> On 11/8/05, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
>  
>
> > I don't think I've heard anything about this on this list:
> >
> > http://www.mono-project.com/
> >
> > What do you think?  Apparently it allows for much interoperability between
> > coding languages.  Someone said that GTK+ bindings in mono are working in
> > all the languages.
> >
> > I like seeing GNU on their pages, but I don't really like the .com and I'm
> > not sure about the .NET -- isn't that Microsoft?
> >
> > Anyway, some people are telling me it's a good thing.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > members mailing list
> > EMAIL:PROTECTED
> > http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
> >
> >    
>
>
> --
>
> - slp
>
> _______________________________________________
> members mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
>  


_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members