Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG] mono
- From: Shawn Parker <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:33:07 -0600
- Delivery-date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:33:21 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qI9mo4hJACd9G0gMMpAqlyXFjyTF4jWaalxFUi82lSoJ8/2Xun80mA9hS33Yn3I6/mC3b4c7ebItRjJluKV4M3WoA+vNJaI+2lb+eQZrMUhXZqWLFP8JdOWo267VolRW5dZ9G6Vc7hFUiU4Z37dPxVemNlL69eOja9fr6bjvpG4=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
why not invest more heavily in the lamp (linux, apache, postgre,
mysql, php, perl, python, ruby, etc) stack instead of coming up with a
middle ground for .net?
On 11/8/05, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> I don't think I've heard anything about this on this list:
>
> http://www.mono-project.com/
>
> What do you think? Apparently it allows for much interoperability between
> coding languages. Someone said that GTK+ bindings in mono are working in
> all the languages.
>
> I like seeing GNU on their pages, but I don't really like the .com and I'm
> not sure about the .NET -- isn't that Microsoft?
>
> Anyway, some people are telling me it's a good thing.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> members mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
>
--
- slp
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members