Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Subject: [MLUG] Remember SCO?
- From: Matthew Schmidt <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:32:29 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;s=beta; d=gmail.com;h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;b=aNKQRi+SOy0kzUGg+0jkM39X7wcxw88COHoaqwcXwsKFzIWmo3DveyGS0y5kAx8QNNto4qoOsaeyIIn6kQM5fcwC0teQuwyN1v2/fwsqOfOKlDUlqJa+vMy7y4RiV7UFvpJ2JH0trowUkpQXdIkFQh8Bg/wg80o96tuEqk7xBNQ=
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: Matthew Schmidt <EMAIL:PROTECTED>, MLUG Members<EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Well, if you do remember SCO, something tells me they may not be
around much longer.
>From Judge Kimball:
"Viewed against the backdrop of SCO's plethora of public statements
concerning IBM's and others' infringement of SCO's purported
copyrights to the Unix software, it is astonishing that SCO has not
offered any competent evidence to create a disputed fact regarding
whether IBM has infringed SCO's alleged copyrights through IBM's Linux
activities."
http://news.com.com/Judge+slams+SCOs+lack+of+evidence+against+IBM/2100-7344_3-5570265.html?tag=nefd.top
Not to turn MLUG into Groklaw or anything, but I just wanted to share
this. Made my day! Finally we've got the JUDGE saying that SCO's case
has no merit. 'Bout time!
Matt
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact