Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
> *sigh* A coworker and I were discussing this, and where binaries and
> other applications should be stored. We both agreed, each program
> should have it's own directory. Has anyone seen where gnome puts all
> it's libraries? UGH. I may like the gnome interface, but where they
> put stuff drives me nuts.
Personally I'd like something like /Packages that contains a subdir for
each package the system knows about. I'd put in each subdir a control
file for downloading, installing, configuring, upgrading, and
uninstalling each package, a subdir for the source, and a subdir for the
built version. Then just link the needed files into /Programs etc. You
can get the best of both Windows and Unix methodology by doing it that way.
> Perhaps they were evil originally, but not so much anymore. I'd say
> /program_files, but if we wanted something that is more descriptive,
> why not use the full name? It doesn't hurt the system at all to do
> so. Mac's use /Applications /System /Library /Users and other folders
> that are actually intuitively named. Granted spaces are a little
> trickier to deal with from a command line, but not inordinately so,
> and considering the benefits of readability, I can put up with spaces.
Spaces are still evil. Wait until you spend a morning dealing with a few
hundred files with spaces in their names to see my point. Capital
letters are fine though. It'd actually not be a bad idea to make a habit
of naming special directories with capital letters.
> Now, there's an interesting thought, although I'd say what about
> creating a distro with everything truly separate and designed the way
> we'd like? Call it MLUG Linux? The Linux that makes sense? I know
> not everyone likes Mac's on the list, but that's an example of a file
> system layout we could look at for examples. Course, it'd be nice to
> get some input from other MLUG'ers out there. Anyone have any other
> thoughts?
I've thought about making my own distro for years but I'd have to have a
good enough reason to motivate me. I know pretty much everything I'd
need to know to do it but there are so many distros already that I'd not
want to contribute to the distro bloat unless I was going to be able to
do enough to make mine stand out.
--
Michael <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
http://kavlon.org
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members