Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
For a Philosophical Discussion, this is fine. If however you choose to
remain unconvinced and choose to act, you will be just as culpable if
someone chooses to prosecute you.
In that realm, it becomes an 'assumption or risk'.
Mike Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Nimrod Levy wrote:
>
>> The point is that just because someone has an open AP that is
>> broadcasting it's SSID for all to see, you do not have the right to
>> connect and make use of the resources unless you have explicit
>> permission from the network operator. And even if you do have that
>> consent, it may be (and usually is) a violation of your upstream
>> provider's residential AUP to share that connection with someone else.
>
>
>
> Tell me about this when someone is successfully sued or prosecuted for
> simply connecting to an open network that required no password and was
> broadcasting its presence to the surrounding world. When that
> happens, I'll believe that there is some validity in the arguments I'm
> seeing here. Otherwise, I remain unconvinced.
>
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> members mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
--
|Christian Marcus Cepel | And the wrens have returned &
EMAIL:PROTECTED icq:12384980 | are nesting; In the hollow of
371 Crown Point, Columbia, MO | that oak where his heart once
65203-2202 573.999.2370 | had been; And he lifts up his
Computer Support Specialist, Sr. | arms in a blessing; For being
University of Missouri-Columbia | born again. --Rich Mullins|
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members