RE: [MLUG] Mac OS X Rendezvous now available for Linux, Windows

[Matt Klaric <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 07:53, Spurling, Shannon wrote:
> No, it's not the same. 
...
> The main difference is that Apple has centered on a set of open RFC
> compliant protocols to bind together to perform the services in a
> specified way. 
...
> So, no, it's not the same and I predict they will not have the same
> issues. 

Specifically what is different about this set of protocols that makes it
more secure than other similar technologies.  It seems as though any
kind of automagic network creation protocol when widely adopted will be
vulnerable to the same kinds of security attacks.  

But please, i'm willing to be convinced otherwise...what makes this
protocol better?
 
-- 
Matt Klaric (klaric.com) <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
public pgp key @ http://pgp.mit.edu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members