Re: [MLUG] Letters to Congress, SCO, and RIAA (was SCO - Linux'threaten's US Security)

[Robin Hastings <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Count me in if you all need help! I majored in English while I was a student at
MU so I'd be happy to proofread or something.

-- 
Robin Hastings
EMAIL:PROTECTED


Quoting "Ross, Matthew" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>:

> Ok, we've kinda gotten into three different subjects, so I think we need to
> separate these out for clarity:
> 
> Most important I think is the letter to Congress. We need to make sure our
> elected imbeciles...err..officials know in their language that anti-Linux
> legislation would be a bad thing before they actually start implementing such
> legislation.
> 
> Second is the open letter to SCO. I think this could be a useful rallying
> point for those of us opposed to their abuse of the legal system. It won't
> change SCO's attitude, but it might stop an attitude of complience from other
> sources. This would need to focus on the false comments they've made, the
> behavior of their company, and most importantly their propoganda attacks on
> Linux.
> 
> Third is the open letter to RIAA. This would neccessarily attack their
> actions rather than their claims. While they may own the music, that does not
> justify their suing children, or their unfounded claims of "harming" the
> musicians while their component entities retain almost all of the royalty
> $'s.
> 
> Should the drafts be moved off-list, or do we work on them here?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> members mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
> 



_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members