Re: [MLUG] LDAP v. NIS v. whatever (for distributed authentication)

Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Subject: Re: [MLUG] LDAP v. NIS v. whatever (for distributed authentication)
From: Dave Lloyd <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:13:36 -0500 (CDT)
In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
List-archive: <http://mlug.missouri.edu/pipermail/members>
List-help: <mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
List-id: MLUG Members <members.mlug.missouri.edu>
List-post: <mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
List-subscribe: <http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members>,<mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members>,<mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Reply-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED, MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED

LDAP is supported by a wide variety of applications for authentication.
I think that it would probably be the best possible compromise.  

On a related note, I wonder if MacOS X has support for PAM. 

-- 
--dlloyd

_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MLUG] LDAP v. NIS v. whatever (for distributed authentication)
  - From: Jason McIntosh <EMAIL:PROTECTED>

References:
- [MLUG] LDAP v. NIS v. whatever (for distributed authentication)
  - From: Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>

Prev by Date: [MLUG] LDAP v. NIS v. whatever (for distributed authentication)
Next by Date: Re: [MLUG] LDAP v. NIS v. whatever (for distributed authentication)
Previous by thread: [MLUG] LDAP v. NIS v. whatever (for distributed authentication)
Next by thread: Re: [MLUG] LDAP v. NIS v. whatever (for distributed authentication)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread