[MLUG] Slackware 8.1: mktemp vs. mkstemp vs. tempnam

Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Subject: [MLUG] Slackware 8.1: mktemp vs. mkstemp vs. tempnam
From: John Engelbrecht <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 20:09:27 -0500 (CDT)
List-archive: <http://mlug.missouri.edu/pipermail/members>
List-help: <mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
List-id: MLUG Members <members.mlug.missouri.edu>
List-post: <mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
List-subscribe: <http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members>,<mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members>,<mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED

in libSWF and in PHP, whats this where the source
tells me, "warning: mktemp is dangerous, use mkstemp"

another one would say to use tempnam.
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members

Prev by Date: RE: RE: [MLUG] 3com 905b NIC, Slackware Linux
Next by Date: RE: RE: RE: [MLUG] 3com 905b NIC, Slackware Linux
Previous by thread: RE: RE: RE: [MLUG] 3com 905b NIC, Slackware Linux
Next by thread: [MLUG] Epson stylus 900
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread