Re: [MLUG] RedHat Enterprise vs. Professional

Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Subject: Re: [MLUG] RedHat Enterprise vs. Professional
From: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:00:26 -0500
In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
List-archive: <http://mlug.missouri.edu/pipermail/members>
List-help: <mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
List-id: MLUG Members <members.mlug.missouri.edu>
List-post: <mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
List-subscribe: <http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members>,<mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members>,<mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Reply-to: MLUG Members <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.6

My watch has almost that much memory.

on 4/15/03 4:17 PM, Mike Miller at EMAIL:PROTECTED wrote:

> Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS (cheaper) supports > 4 MB RAM while RedHat
> Enterprise Linux ES (more expensive) does not support > 4 MB RAM...

_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members

References:
- Re: [MLUG] RedHat Enterprise vs. Professional
  - From: Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>

Prev by Date: Re: [MLUG] RedHat Enterprise vs. Professional
Next by Date: [MLUG] Found tomcat problem
Previous by thread: Re: [MLUG] RedHat Enterprise vs. Professional
Next by thread: Re: [MLUG] RedHat Enterprise vs. Professional
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread