Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Mike Miller wrote:
> I'm trying to get a handle on the options and their costs and benefits.
> Apparently, the Itanium2 64-bit CPU will not run SAS under Linux, so we
> aren't going to be able to use it. We must have a Linux on a 32-bit CPU
> so that we can run SAS.
>
> I'm looking at a few things on the web. It seems that Athlons and Xeons
> are both nice, fast chips. Will Linux perform differently on the two
> types of chips (e.g., stability)? How about price differences? Am I
> missing other good options?
>
> All advice is very welcome!
Athlon systems are generally much, much cheaper than Xeons, but actually
finding a vendor that sells and supports large-scale Athlon systems is
pretty hard. You mentioned before that you had an existing support
contract with HP. They have plenty of big Xeon boxes, but no Athlons.
They also have some AMAZING Alpha boxes, which would be my
recommendation over Itanium2. Unfortunately, SAS won't work on Alpha
Linux. It does look like it runs on Tru64 UNIX, though, which is the
Alpha's 'main' UNIX platform.
Ian
_______________________________________________
members mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/members
- Prev by Date:
[MLUG] hardware platforms for Linux: athlon, xeon, itanium, etc.
- Next by Date:
Re: [MLUG] hardware platforms for Linux: athlon, xeon, itanium, etc.
- Previous by thread:
[MLUG] hardware platforms for Linux: athlon, xeon, itanium, etc.
- Next by thread:
Re: [MLUG] hardware platforms for Linux: athlon, xeon, itanium, etc.
- Index(es):