Re: [MLUG] Win2k a security risk

Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Subject: Re: [MLUG] Win2k a security risk
From: Mikhail Kovalenko <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:35:16 -0500
References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Reply-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020513

yoda wrote:
> For those of you who don't read Slashdot (and therefore don't already know
> about it), I figured this would be pretty amusing:
> 
> http://www.ucsbdailynexus.com/news/2002/3415.html

That is very amusing. Ban Win2K from the network but force WinXP on people 
instead -- how's that going to solve their problems? Obviously UCSB's ResNet 
is grossly understaffed; they didn't give the problem much thought.

-- 
MK

--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MLUG] Win2k a security risk
  - From: Rick Buford <EMAIL:PROTECTED>

References:
- [MLUG] Win2k a security risk
  - From: yoda <EMAIL:PROTECTED>

Prev by Date: RE: [MLUG] Win2k a security risk
Next by Date: Re: [MLUG] Win2k a security risk
Previous by thread: Re: [MLUG] Off every subject whatsoever...
Next by thread: Re: [MLUG] Win2k a security risk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread