RE: [MLUG] TLS and POP (was "secure POP?")

Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Subject: RE: [MLUG] TLS and POP (was "secure POP?")
From: "Russell Horn" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 19:55:25 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Reply-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED

> -----Original Message-----
> From: EMAIL:PROTECTED
> [mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mike Miller
> Sent: 18 July 2002 19:45
> To: MLUG membership
> Subject: [MLUG] TLS and POP (was "secure POP?")
>
>
> Anyone know anything about TLS?  Any experience?  It sounds like it will
> be great if the users willingly migrate to POP clients that support TLS.

As I understand it, that's what I explained in my second post using stunnel
on the server and enabling it on your client - assuming it's outlook,
netscape or another that can negotiate the ssl connection.

Russell

--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/

References:
- [MLUG] TLS and POP (was "secure POP?")
  - From: Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>

Prev by Date: [MLUG] TLS and POP (was "secure POP?")
Next by Date: Re: [MLUG] Linux Checkinstall program
Previous by thread: [MLUG] TLS and POP (was "secure POP?")
Next by thread: [MLUG] Mastering Regular Expressions, Second Edition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread