Re: [MLUG] Study: Open source poses security risks (???)

Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Subject: Re: [MLUG] Study: Open source poses security risks (???)
From: Mark Haidekker <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 11:35:06 -0500
In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Reply-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED

On Wednesday 12 June 2002 11:09 am, you wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Mark Haidekker wrote:
> > And how much did a certain Redmond-based company pay for this
> > assessment?
>
> What can I say?  You *nailed* that one!!
>
> From SANS newsletter...

Oh well... First of all, I'm not surprised. Then, (sigh) why do always the 
_worst_ assumptions about Microsoft come true?

Thanks for posting this. 

Mark
--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MLUG] Study: Open source poses security risks (???)
  - From: Jonathan King <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Re: [MLUG] Study: Open source poses security risks (???)
  - From: "(8?ť" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>

References:
- Re: [MLUG] Study: Open source poses security risks (???)
  - From: Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>

Prev by Date: RE: [MLUG] new series of attacks
Next by Date: RE: [MLUG] Study: Open source poses security risks (???)
Previous by thread: Re: [MLUG] Study: Open source poses security risks (???)
Next by thread: Re: [MLUG] Study: Open source poses security risks (???)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread