Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: RE: [MLUG] Question w/ regards to Security and UM Policy, along w ith Distributed Computing
- From: "Spurling, Shannon" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 14:05:22 -0600
- Reply-To: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Thread-Index: AcGP2BsHa153ncCFQR+oIuyr0rhhawAAEQ8A
- Thread-Topic: [MLUG] Question w/ regards to Security and UM Policy, along w ith Distributed Computing
But, I shouldn't. :-)
DS-0 = 64Kb Standard phone line, also 56Kb (Magic number?) if the older
framing/signaling is used
DS-1 = 1.544Mb Also known as a T1, according to the T carrier
specification. Made up of 24 DS-0 frames.
DS-2 = 6.132Mb Not sure of any one who uses this. Made up of 4 DS-1
frames.
DS-3 = 44.736Mb Also known as a T3. Made up of 28 DS-1 channels.
now
OC-1 = 51.840Mb First level of the optical carrier standards. Made up of
1 DS-3 plus framing to ensure synchronization and timing is maintained
over the fiber.
OC-3 = 155.520Mb Lowest common optical SONET carrier. Made up of three
DS-3's
OC-12 = 622.080Mb Carries 4 OC-3's or 12 DS-3's
OC-24 = 1.244Gb 24 DS-3's
OC-48 = 2.488Gb 48 DS-3's
OC-192 = 9.953Gb 192 DS-3's
Europe uses the E carrier system. These number came off a Telcordia
chart, and may be slightly different depending on who you ask. :-)
Notice the common thread? Every thing is in multiples of DS-0's. That's
because all of these carrier technologies were designed to carry TDM'ed
(Time Division Multiplexed) phone signals between telephone CO's.
Also, here's something to think about. When you are sending a signal
across a wire, you are either transmitting, or not. If you are using 50%
of your bandwidth, you are actually using 100% of the wire, 50% of the
time, for the period of time the measurement was made. Messes with your
head, doesn't it? :-)
Shannon Spurling
WAN Engineer -Specialist
MOREnet, Network Services, Core Network
3212 LeMone Industrial Blvd.
Columbia, MO 65201
Main:(573) 884-7200 Fax:(573)884-6673
EMAIL:PROTECTED
EMAIL:PROTECTED
-----Original Message-----
From: Brent Deterding [mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:48 PM
To: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Subject: RE: [MLUG] Question w/ regards to Security and UM Policy, along
w ith Distributed Computing
Optical Carrier - 3, as opposed to DS-3 Digitial Signal - 3
OC3=155 Mbit over fiber
DS3=45 Mbit over copper
Now Shannon can elaborate . . . :)
-- Brent
-----Original Message-----
From: EMAIL:PROTECTED
[mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Stephen
Montgomery-Smith
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:32 PM
To: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Subject: Re: [MLUG] Question w/ regards to Security and UM Policy, along
w ith Distributed Computing
What is an OC-3 ?
"Spurling, Shannon" wrote:
>
> Mizzou? I don't know, I'm just guessing. :-) An OC-3 costs somewhere
in
> the neighborhood of $30,000 a month, I think. And that is just an
OC-3.
> Then you have equipment, space, people, charges for connectivity to an
> ISP.... It all adds up.
> I really have no idea how much any of this costs Mizzou, or any one
> else. The $30K figure is based on numbers I hear thrown around. I just
> fix it, I don't bid, buy, or pay for it.
>
> Shannon Spurling
> WAN Engineer -Specialist
>
> MOREnet, Network Services, Core Network
> 3212 LeMone Industrial Blvd.
> Columbia, MO 65201
>
> Main:(573) 884-7200 Fax:(573)884-6673
>
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross, Matt [mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:20 AM
> To: EMAIL:PROTECTED
> Subject: RE: [MLUG] Question w/ regards to Security and UM Policy,
along
> w ith Distributed Computing
>
> > At an early stage in the proceedings, prosecutors claimed
> > that McOwen
> > had cost the state of Georgia $415,000 in bandwidth
> > charges, based on a
> > calculation that the distributed.net clients consumed
> > precisely 59 cents
> > worth of bandwidth per second. The state has since backed
> > away from the
> > $415,000 figure.
> >
> > Which is ridiculous -- 59 cents per second??!! Why are they lying?
> > Then there is this part...
>
> Bandwidth is expensive, but how the hell he can clog $415,000 worth of
> it is
> beyond me.
> 703389 seconds -> 8 days (plus about 3 hours). At current bandwidth
> rates,
> that would have to be one hell of a line he tied up. He's fully tying
> up a
> $1,529,280 per month connection for 8 days. What university has a
> budget
> for $18,351,360 annually just to connect to the web?
> --
> To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php
>
> Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/
> --
> To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php
>
> Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php
Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/
--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php
Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/
--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php
Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/