Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
> Since we had the presentation on djbdns, which is supposed to be more
> secure than BIND, I'll ask the naive question, why wouldn't that be
> better?
Because we are using QIP as our DNS/IP management platform, and it will only
talk to a certain small number of DNS servers, BIND being among them.
BIND isn't that bad if you are willing to actually *maintain* the thing and
you have a backup plan going. Most of the exploits I've seen with BIND
involve admins who really should have known better.
--J
--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php
Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact