Re: [MLUG] MLUG Server

[Andrew Procter <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Neil Bradshaw wrote:

> >What was the decision on upgrades to MLUG Server.  What was done ?
> 
> The word for today is "motivation". No one's motivated to do it, so 
> nothing's getting done as far as the server goes. It seems to work 
> fine, though.

  As far as I can tell, the word is actually "justification."  The current
server meets all our needs, and we're never going to be independent of the
University because we need bandwidth in any case.  Would we really use a
jazzed-up server?  Files can -- and should, as you pointed out -- be
hosted on freesoftware.
  (Well, okay, that doesn't explain the hard drive...)

> I've noticed lately that the mailing list is about all that remains 
> of MLUG. No meetings, no geekfests, no expos, no flyers, etc. It 
> doesn't bother me a whole lot, but it's an observation worth noting.

  What happened to that geekfest you were gonna do?  Maybe you could dust
that off.
  I think we should start meeting biweekly (ha ha -- sounds
familiar) regardless of whether or not anyone can present.  We've been
holding off because nobody wants to present, right?

--
 Andrew Procter (EMAIL:PROTECTED)
  "I WILL MEDITATE AND THEN DESTROY YOU!"
  -- Dhalsim, Street Fighter II


--
To unsubscribe, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/