MLUG: Re: [MLUG] nano editor?
Re: [MLUG] nano editor?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Vi has all the friendliness of a mad skunk and emacs is as bloated as a
hippo. I'll stick to a nice squirrel of an editor.. something that is not
to big but is still kinda cute. Do we really need editor wars? Feel free 
to use vi if you like. :)

*^*^*^*
Michael McGlothlin <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
http://www.kavlon.com

On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Neil Bradshaw wrote:

> Vi is better :P

--
To manage your subscription, go to http://mlug.missouri.edu/members/edit.php

Archives are available at http://mlug.missouri.edu/list-archives/