Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Is Obama a Shill for the Ethanol Lobby?

["Vern Green" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

I have also wondered why we cannot use the stocks of the corn that is left in the field, the yield might not be as high, but the oil extracted from it should work.

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Nowlin, Dan <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:

What need to happen with ethanol is to get off of this kick of using
corn and start using switch grass.  It grows everywhere corn can grow
and is not used for anything, well maybe grazing.  The ethanol output of
this grass is a lot higher then with corn.

--
Daniel Nowlin
DataCenter Tech III
TelCom DataCenter

-----Original Message-----
From: EMAIL:PROTECTED
[mailto:EMAIL:PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Miller
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 23:52
To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion
Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Is Obama a Shill for the Ethanol Lobby?

On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Jack Smith wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 19:37 -0500, Mike Miller wrote:
>
>> I used to think ethanol was good, but now I think it is wasting too
much
>> good farm land.  It's working for Brazil but they can grow lots of
extra
>> sugar cane, apparently.
>
> I wouldn't say that it is wasting farm land at all. By definition,
> wasting something means getting little to no benefit from it.

But the return on the energy investment is pretty poor.  Are they being
subsidized or otherwise encouraged to get into the ethanol business?  It

isn't just a free market situation, is it?

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion

-- 
Thanks
F Vernon Green
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion