Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Vern Green wrote:
See Mike, that flies in the face of everything you have said on this
forum about how much money people are worth. Why is it alright for
Edwards to make 3.5 million on the backs of another person's injuries,
when it is not alright for a CEO to make 3.5 million when his company is
selling goods?
Maybe I am having a bad day, if I am, its because it is so hard for me
to concentrate with your inconsistencies blinding me all day long.
Your understanding would be helped greatly by a better memory. Maybe my
ideas are too subtle for you. I never said that no one should make $3.5
million / year. I would say that the tax rate should be high at that
level and it should increase to 90%, maybe more, after somewhere around
$10 million / year.
The thing that really bothers me is when someone makes $3.7 billion in a
single year and pays no more than about 35% in federal income tax (yes,
that did happen in 2007). If his income could be considered capital
gains, he would only pay 15% federal income tax on it -- much less than
what we pay. We should seek to limit the power and influence of the
super-rich. They do not have our best interests in mind and they will
influence policy to their personal benefit.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion