Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Vern Green wrote:
Did he help any sick people who were harmed by reckless doctors or
hospitals? What do you think should be done -- should we just stop
having malpractice lawsuits in order to save money on healthcare? I
definitely prefer the world I have now to a world without malpractice
suits.
Oh then, I am sure that Edwards only took a small but reasonable amount
of the cut from each of those suits, after all it is all about taking
care of the sick or injured isn't it? I am sure those 3.5 million plus
payouts he received went to those who really needed it.
For someone who seems to know very little you come across as quite
confident, even defiant. Today has not been a good day for you.
Usually an attorney will take about 1/3 of the settlement and the other
2/3 goes to the client. Is that a bad system? I don't think it is. The
attorney is motivated to provide the maximum possible settlement for his
client, which is just what you would want as a client. If Edwards took
$3.5 million, then his client probably took about $7.0 million. So the
$7.0 million "went to those who really needed it," and the other $3.5
million went to Edwards and from there I'm not sure where, but probably
some of it goes to campaigning and some to charity.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion