Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] James McCanney and the prime numbers
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 08:19:42 -0500
- Delivery-date: Fri, 02 May 2008 08:20:17 -0500
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080420 SeaMonkey/1.1.9
Mike Miller wrote:
After reading a little more about Cantor, I think there are many reasons
why crazy people would attack him. Just look at the second paragraph here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor
That is exactly right. There is something remarkably counter-intuitive
about Cantor's theory about the infinite. However his ideas are
definitely now a major part of mainstream mathematics, and are typically
taught in the first week or so of a standard graduate math program.
The core of Cantor's argument is more or less the same as the core of
Godel's argument, and is basically a variation of the famous liar paradox.
Stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion