Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [MLUG][DISCUSSION] Another reason not to be like France
- From: "Jonathan King" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:53:20 -0400
- Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:53:31 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=8YlbtKEN1XO0IrgtCWB2E7xCGtqGwRNSYwKbD5hKpms=; b=i9oYGhFFQ5vbdhMMBktErJfQ4V9eQcfkUWbztryt3bOZoIzaSIQoc5FQAgyx/mf4dBCozDvmWZO9G0mHLyNzkXX7B4YdUkpNCTVH8QUhaLZWeG3cotVlKQsMB+3rSHF73PxsQ/EhGJjrlRbGB1DLlPqvXeXLKtLUiHA4RBTAscQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=d+D34KZ8/4vHP7pWkvpWlpI9QxZOAqrV5opbVowoewZgLOMA7oBnotAy7XrcVGMv7Z5uNibFPP3Drg6WfgwehEVlpL2Fqis2HmaAJd9eqDIQF2uIcxOI2dI1fdpohkEbTzd1VwMkim33p5b7jwISDlcD9AhNIye3TbORrPkkrzY=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On 4/16/08, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> Mike Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Scott Hussey wrote:
> >
> > > Interesting that the French signed their own death certificate. Without
> America's democratic experiment (and the huge debt racked up by France in
> the Revolutionary War), it is doubtful the French Revolution would have
> happened with quite the same fervor.
> >
> > Did the French royals do this because they were more concerned about
> controlling the British than with dealing with an uprising of their own
> people?
>
> I don't know. But history books I read as a kid suggest that the British
> and French were on very agreeable terms at home - it was just in their
> foreign policies that they were at loggerheads.
And had been for a very long time. I always supposed that French and
Spanish cooperation with the American colonists was based almost
exclusively on the fact they wanted to weaken Britain.
> Maybe it was a case of
> breakdown of communication in the government between home affairs and
> foreign affairs.
>
> I would think that the French royalty were utterly dismissive and arrogant
> in any dangers they may have perceived from their own people.
The French royalty and aristocracy of the 18th century practically
*define* dismissive and arrogant, with a bit of stupifying ignorance
thrown in. I mean, "Let them eat cake" (not actually cake but a
different kind of quick bread) was really more completely clueless
than it was arrogant.
jking
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion