Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [MLUG][DISCUSSION] Another reason not to be like France
- From: "Jonathan King" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:41:56 -0400
- Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:42:06 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=YQAmdJiKc6DNLc92V32D09cszEc4c+uoOWAhxgrAqyI=; b=GCU2F4v0/3ogBDd7uOTLYf+o1+BJaa0Fk9pza38tG75ZoJ55mOmU1CmTbJZDlSXnN65SjivkRD3G38dkRKY9SGh3KxOggQR/1R6mRsjM5Yx/wUldefsm2gtnEWMwkAkPez5YyAi3CGH9pcN3rtgRZEA2ryXp/r37KB1FsHufBsw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CZW/qTzlXMydhAPN+nWQPFhhsNHpjlXAgg/Gefu8XdGAsp7vd30ZmX7y944FP0cCyOKNBcKNTiMh3nNLT1B//cHhxbB/BzK/JK9V6g0PzD8wcFK1uskCZx7uDVFICf/t+eQogNEGUDdtyyzNEVOFatpgHwOqAgXtOErc81Vc+6c=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Actually, I was more curious about your opinions than Mike's.
jking
On 4/16/08, Vern Green <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> Well Jonathan, it appears you have your answer... I don't even have to
> think, Mike can do it for me...
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Jonathan King wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Vern Green <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> > >
> > > http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2273909,00.html
> > > >
> > > > Since when did it become a racial hate crime to speak out against a
> > > > religion?
> > > >
> > > > Apparently France does not have a first ammendment equivalent.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Lack of a real first amendment is certainly one thing I would not like
> > > to see us emulate. I could go either way on the 1% tax to support
> culture.
> > > But you seem to have a long list of issues with France, but I am not
> sure
> > > what they are. Could you elaborate?
> > >
> >
> >
> > Ha! Of course you know what to expect next. Let's see how close I can
> > get...
> >
> > In the years after 9/11, France did not support the invasion of Iraq and
> > the conservative bloggers and talk radio crowd went crazy on them for it.
> > Some conservatives in Congress started referring to "freedom fries"
> instead
> > of french fries. These attackers then came up with something on the
> French
> > that would stick: The French hadn't managed to defend their country
> against
> > the Nazis in WWII. We had to save them, it is said, so they owe us.
> > Supposedly the French cave in easily, are weak and need our protection --
> > that's the conservative talking point on France. It's a country of
> > sniveling, dependent weaklings who think their great food and high culture
> > make them better than us. Pansies! They only exist because we let them
> > exist!
> >
> > Given what we know now about the greatness of the Iraq war and occupation
> > and all the wonderous things it has done for our country, the French must
> be
> > really embarrassed. What a huge mistake they were making! How could they
> > have thought to question our claim about WMD? They are just sooo
> arrogant.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discussion mailing list
> > EMAIL:PROTECTED
> > http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> F Vernon Green
>
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion