MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] musicians
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] musicians
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Jim Locke wrote:

I hate to say it, but I know some artists have gotten more corporate (more formulaic, less interesting, more blah basically) after they cleaned up.

That probably depends on how messed up they were. Drugs definitely interfere massively after some point and cleaning up has definitely saved many careers. On the other hand, someone who isn't too far gone might just decide to become more conventional, drop the drug use and sell more records.



I'm curious if my current favorite band, Porcupine Tree, has been into drugs. They certainly have some psychedelic sounds in their past (and still now to some extent).

I'll leave this post with: anyone who think they would like a more driving, modern sounding Pink Floyd that I think sounds of a Rush, Pink Floyd, and YES or King Crimson combination seriously ought to check them out.

They have a Myspace page with some full-length tracks to check out.

One thing I've noticed is that the rock reviewers on allmusic.com seem to really hate prog/art rock. You also won't find any Yes or ELP or Rush in the Rolling Stone's list of "The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time" but they have plenty of Pink Floyd and Bowie.


As a teenager I listened to a lot of Yes, Rush and ELP so I tend to like it. I'll check out Porcupine Tree.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion