MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Spitzer
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Spitzer
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Mike Miller wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Christian M. Cepel wrote:

The different prostitutes at the agency had different prices with a range of something like $1000/hr to $5500/hr. I think Spitzer was caught with one who charged $3000/hr and he paid her $4300 which might have included travel and tip or maybe he spent 1 hr 20 mins with her.
The contracted time I've heard was 4 hours and all sorts of different dollar figures. This time of course.. there were others.
If you think about it, probably the major reason why men have evolved to strive for power is that having power gave access to females, but today a powerful man is expected to have sex only with his 50-year-old wife or not at all. No wonder that they "slip up" and fall into extra-marital affairs or prostitution. I don't see it as hard to explain.
Oh for goodness sakes. This old argument again. You know there are billions of men across millenniums who managed to be faithful. I'm sure they were all powerless undersexed men... or perhaps they just felt that their marriage vows were just that. Vows. People did and do have honor... an internal drive to make their word as concrete as though it was exactly that.... concrete.. or something even more immutable.

The thing that is hard to explain is why we have developed a culture that stops powerful men from having multiple sex partners. Why is that? It doesn't work that way in a lot of other places, like Saudi Arabia -- Osama Bin Laden was one of something like 51 children of his father.
We developed it? Last I heard there's a long history of powerful men who weren't so weak as to succumb to their own "overpowering" sexual urges despite having given their oath not to. I mean wow. If you're powerful and cannot be monogamous, you're practically a victim.

There's also a long history of men _not_ honoring their word or not living in cultures that prompt them to make this promise. There's a long history of cultures where this 'promise' is mean to be word only.... thus a lot of criticism by our European neighbors. There's nothing new under the sun and these arguments of 'today' are utter nonsense.


-- Christian M. Cepel - Thistledowne Productions - http://thistledowne.org Computer Support Specialist, Sr. - University of Missouri - Columbia College of Education - School of Info Science & Learning Technologies VRCbd, KidTools & StrategyTools Support Systems Projects, and Truman, Library Whistlestop Project - Web Design & Programming - 573.999.2370


_______________________________________________ discussion mailing list EMAIL:PROTECTED http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion