Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Holt-Oram Syndrome
- From: "Jonathan King" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:36:25 -0700
- Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:36:33 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=e9e/r91hx2AN3ocpgn8PxY5VR8aA9E/sHnsYkMOhSAs=; b=Tl5smDPIk+p67svAbYFqUKy4uEK8ZKn+QRFIqCjKpP5nEXIgbpR4cHsPjXEUas6Lc3z7hkxw3gXK/+0M/x5svhKTG/JI/feVyBW3IrjlA5iVVSkiLmszXG3ydUG4HR8HQ2v1ZnwJM3Fd1ETxPE9c+rD5SM3g2/4HFl9qJxhHdlU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=voqLrRG9Gpw3GMfw2BJ16p4gH3+FkN8nHPvO3dlMtYsiwZd3/z2KhlK0q671jZFVbEgqYeqBXDhVo69wkj/UlvJpAArBwUXftyz1VBTN2vFQHtDxICR4sGkjuHNUHR5JNW+L7WUnkHvFPu1OSTv85Sx381yubmgT+nq90iKiPcU=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Jonathan King wrote:
> >>
> >> The left thumb is "nonopposable" and "finger like" -- those are the
> >> terms I'm seeing for that kind of thing in OMIM. Certainly there are
> >> not many known conditions that cause that trait and Holt-Oram is one of
> >> those conditions.
> >
> > I don't know if there are really any others that also account for the
> > cardiac symptoms.
>
> Right. It really is looking like Holt-Oram but there could be a lot that
> I don't know.
I've pounded through OMIM pretty hard, though, and there isn't very
much else out there that has been described much. But "coincidence" is
still a slightly plausible hypothesis when the alternative is a 1 in
100,000 genetic disorder.
> > OK, but the gene is like 47 kilobp and there are lots of known point
> > mutations. They might have done a full karyotype, but that might not
> > have shown anything, there are lots of things that can cause heart
> > issues, and the hand issue, although visible, is pretty subtle.
> > Holt-Oram is a rare disorder.
>
> They definitely wouldn't normally find Holt-Oram from the cytogenetics,
> but they would have been looking for other things like small insertions or
> deletions. They probably did that and found nothing.
They might have, but they may have just done a standard karyotype
looking for trisomy of chr. 21. Sure, that would annoy somebody like
you, but is it really true that most places do chromosomal painting
these days?
> >> I would have thought that cytogenetic analysis would always be ordered
> >> when idiopathic heart defects are seen, but it isn't my area.
> >
> > Nor mine, but see above. Do you have some specific test in mind here?
>
> Just what I just added above. The usual screening for micro
> insertion/deletion.
I'll bet you $5 they just did a karyotype with Giemsa staining. That
would be payable as one beer at a brew pub the next time we're in the
same city at the same time. (Oh yeah: are you going to either APS or
the BG meeting in Louisville?)
jking
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion