MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] so this is pretty scary [MUSIC]
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] so this is pretty scary [MUSIC]
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
This is not scary to me, this is downright exciting if it works as well as they let on which I am skeptical.
 
I doubt it would work well on any mixed tracks. For instance a track that has guitar, sax and bass on it, along with a piano, drum and vocal track, but even if you could only do this with a single track it is pretty awesome.
 


 
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Jonathan King wrote:

> Part of me thinks this is so cool. The other part of me is very afraid:
>
> http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna

Afraid of what?  That it takes music away from musicians and puts in in
the hands of computer scientists?  It is pretty interesting.  How long
before computers with software like this and some kind of AI can produce
new music that we really like?


> So the geek-dude programmer suggesting this is theoretically impossible
> is, I believe, exaggerating the case somewhat. I think what he did was
> find an efficient implementation of pretty well-known blind source
> separation algorithms. I don't think it's accidental the demo uses
> guitar chords rather than piano chords primarily. Still...I'm impressed.

Would the separation be harder for piano?  I'm not sure.  I can think of
another good reason to focus on guitar -- lots of hobbyists play guitars.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion



--
Thanks
F Vernon Green
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion